Sagar2007
05-06 05:15 PM
E-filed EAD on 24th April.
Supporting documents received on Apr 28th.
Received EAD receipt on April 30.
Last year I remember receing the receipt and biometric appt letter together.
Has anyone who efiled for EAD renewal this year have received biometrics appointment?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
indian111
Yes, I did apply EAD renewal thru e-file on 4/26/2010. Rec'd FP for 5/20/2010.
I just went for a walk-in today(05/06/2010) and completed the FP(Code 2).
Waiting for the approval.
Supporting documents received on Apr 28th.
Received EAD receipt on April 30.
Last year I remember receing the receipt and biometric appt letter together.
Has anyone who efiled for EAD renewal this year have received biometrics appointment?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
indian111
Yes, I did apply EAD renewal thru e-file on 4/26/2010. Rec'd FP for 5/20/2010.
I just went for a walk-in today(05/06/2010) and completed the FP(Code 2).
Waiting for the approval.
wallpaper tea leoni family man. tea
Khujaokutta
03-19 11:14 PM
Oh Angel....please help me....i have been waiting in the Q for a long long time....can u kindly...expedite my GC......first i was a Kutta....now due to the itches all over....caused by wait for my GC i have become what my name indicates.....:D
siddhu98
04-11 11:07 AM
My wife and son are going to India on vacation this summer. Their current H4 visa got expired (June 2006) on their passports. They have a valid I-797 notice expiring Oct 2007.
However, I am applying my H1B extension next month and will get 3 years extension sometime in May 2007. I want to get them visa stamp based on my new approval notice.
For dependent H4 visa stamp, do they need their own approval notice 797 or principal's approval notice be sufficient to get the stamping?
Thanks.
SK
However, I am applying my H1B extension next month and will get 3 years extension sometime in May 2007. I want to get them visa stamp based on my new approval notice.
For dependent H4 visa stamp, do they need their own approval notice 797 or principal's approval notice be sufficient to get the stamping?
Thanks.
SK
2011 tea leoni family man.
subba
02-02 07:40 AM
I woke up this morning and reading thru this thread feels like a emotional rollercoaster ride.
I am promising myself I won't check IV all day today otherwise I will get no work done :-(
I am promising myself I won't check IV all day today otherwise I will get no work done :-(
more...
ameerka_dream
04-15 10:25 AM
^^^^^^^^^^bump^^^^^^^^^^
pcs
12-26 02:57 PM
I will add my $100 & send the checks. One more co-worker will put in $50 through the credit card.
Let us all try like this from our co workers. I think guys do not mind paying but are too lazy to write the check. So we need to chase them...
One more technique, I have used.... give your friend $10 or $20 in cash & ask him to go online and contribute an amount by adding some money to your cash contribution...
Let us all try like this from our co workers. I think guys do not mind paying but are too lazy to write the check. So we need to chase them...
One more technique, I have used.... give your friend $10 or $20 in cash & ask him to go online and contribute an amount by adding some money to your cash contribution...
more...
gc_in_30_yrs
01-18 12:07 PM
paid $170 until now with different user ids.
signed up for $20 per month.
keep up the good work core team. we have a ray of hope thru IV only.
signed up for $20 per month.
keep up the good work core team. we have a ray of hope thru IV only.
2010 Picture 2, -, Tea Leoni
learning01
02-01 08:46 PM
by congressional staff. Because the CR (Congressional Record) of SA 187 and SA 180 refer to the same CR .
Or
it is possible that SA 180 is merged with 187, as I read ( I can post) the Senate discussion verbatim and Senator Kennedy introduced SA187. And the CR record has these confusing.
S.AMDT.187 to H.R.2 , by Kerry Refers to CR S1121--Passed (does not contain backlog or immigration provisions)
S.AMDT.180 to H.R.2 , by Kennedy Refers to CR S1088-1104 --Not Passed/not voted--(S1088-1104---consists of Backlog reduction provisions).
We missed it guys......very narrowly.
Or
it is possible that SA 180 is merged with 187, as I read ( I can post) the Senate discussion verbatim and Senator Kennedy introduced SA187. And the CR record has these confusing.
S.AMDT.187 to H.R.2 , by Kerry Refers to CR S1121--Passed (does not contain backlog or immigration provisions)
S.AMDT.180 to H.R.2 , by Kennedy Refers to CR S1088-1104 --Not Passed/not voted--(S1088-1104---consists of Backlog reduction provisions).
We missed it guys......very narrowly.
more...
breddy2000
01-23 02:11 AM
:eek:I believe Indians want to enjoy life too much after coming to US, the only way to succeed is to work hard and with sincerity . Based on the observation i see very few Indians fully committing themselves to work. not sure why :confused:
Give me a break!!!!. Dude you must be smoking dope. Do you really think Indians do not commit themselves to work and still get paid for their service to the company. Remember we live in a Capitalistic country and its a "Dog Eat Dog" world out here. No service, No Pay. If you are out of a project and are not put in a different project and is on bench, you will be shown the exit door. This is not a country like the Indian Govt. service sector where people enjoy their life with gauranteed income and pension.
I'm not sure how you got this feeling, but let me try to explain some of the reasons about your thoughts.
1.) People might be more smarter than you might think. What takes 10 Hrs to finish a job can be done in 2 Hrs if you have great skills and is highly Productive. Working hard does not always mean you slog your ass off ...This will be counter productive. Working harder means you might not be having enough skills to complete the job or you are not smart enough to complete the job within the assigned date.
2.) There needs to be a balance between work and personal life. Do you really think people always need to care about work and no life after work?
3.) GC Issues. People are still working within the limitations of the skill sets that have been detailed in ones LC. They worked such a long time within the same skill set, its very easy for someone to complete the Job within no time based on number of years worked on that skillset.
4.) Even if someone wants to work harder, take additonal responsibilities and want to progress in their career, every one knows that they are constrained by the GC process which will discourage them to try and acheive them and no wonder we all are hooked to IV forums to make our lives better after having GC in hand.
Hope this helps you better understand the situation and pls do not generalize your personal opinions.:eek:
Give me a break!!!!. Dude you must be smoking dope. Do you really think Indians do not commit themselves to work and still get paid for their service to the company. Remember we live in a Capitalistic country and its a "Dog Eat Dog" world out here. No service, No Pay. If you are out of a project and are not put in a different project and is on bench, you will be shown the exit door. This is not a country like the Indian Govt. service sector where people enjoy their life with gauranteed income and pension.
I'm not sure how you got this feeling, but let me try to explain some of the reasons about your thoughts.
1.) People might be more smarter than you might think. What takes 10 Hrs to finish a job can be done in 2 Hrs if you have great skills and is highly Productive. Working hard does not always mean you slog your ass off ...This will be counter productive. Working harder means you might not be having enough skills to complete the job or you are not smart enough to complete the job within the assigned date.
2.) There needs to be a balance between work and personal life. Do you really think people always need to care about work and no life after work?
3.) GC Issues. People are still working within the limitations of the skill sets that have been detailed in ones LC. They worked such a long time within the same skill set, its very easy for someone to complete the Job within no time based on number of years worked on that skillset.
4.) Even if someone wants to work harder, take additonal responsibilities and want to progress in their career, every one knows that they are constrained by the GC process which will discourage them to try and acheive them and no wonder we all are hooked to IV forums to make our lives better after having GC in hand.
Hope this helps you better understand the situation and pls do not generalize your personal opinions.:eek:
hair family man. tea leoni 2011
anjans
05-04 01:52 PM
+1 to the GC benefit list for me..that i can say anything ;-)
You have been doing that without a GC for the longest time on this list!
You have been doing that without a GC for the longest time on this list!
more...
i4u
05-04 12:38 PM
check out the iv wikki: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS/EAD FAQ - Immigration Wiki (http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/FREQUENTLY_ASKED_QUESTIONS/EAD_FAQ#EAD_E-Filing_Experiences)
hot tea leoni family man. hot
pappu
07-19 01:35 AM
Even after posting replies people still don't listen and continue to hurt members and IV core and blame us for being selfish.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10617
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10617
more...
house WE tea leoni family man.
trueguy
09-24 12:49 PM
If DOS continues with this interpretation of spillover then there is a very small (tiny) window coming up in third quarter of FY 2010 (Apr'2010) where we might see some spillover to EB3. Here is how:
Currently there are total 4050 (EB1) + 74932 (EB2) = 78982. These are mostly pre-adjudicated and waiting for VISA numbers.
Total allocation for new FY is 140K out of which 40K (28.6%) will go to EB3. So EB1 and EB2 will have 100K left but their total demand is only 78982. So these 21K numbers will be left which will be used for new applications recieved under EB2 category.
When PD for EB2-I/C moves forward, there will be more applications coming in because many EB2-I/C people have their labor approved and they are waiting to file their I-485. However, when these new applications comes in, they are NOT processed yet and their background check is not clear yet. So even if visa numbers are available for them, they are not ready to be approved.
So at this time we poor EB3 people can hope some mercy from DOS and we hope that DOS might spill those remaining 21K numbers to EB3 so we don't waste any numbers while USCIS is adjudicating those newly recd applications under EB2.
If this 21K spillover happens then we EB3-I have to hope for another mercy from DOS that they give these 21K spillover numbers strictly based on Priority dates in EB3 and not based on EB3-ROW first and then EB3-C and then EB3-M/P and then EB3-I. We expect DOS to give these spillover based on PD and not based on country of chargeability. If that happens then all these numbers will go to EB3-I and we might see it moving to 2003.
And this is a fair expectation from DOS that they give spillover numbers based on PD because that is what they are doing in EB2-. When EB2-ROW numbers goes to EB2-I and EB2-C they go based on PD and hence EB2-I gets most of the numbers.
My two cents. Please post your comments on my theory.
If we all EB3 agrees to above theory then we should seek help from IV to make sure that spillover to EB3 happens based on PD whenever it happens.
Thanks.
Currently there are total 4050 (EB1) + 74932 (EB2) = 78982. These are mostly pre-adjudicated and waiting for VISA numbers.
Total allocation for new FY is 140K out of which 40K (28.6%) will go to EB3. So EB1 and EB2 will have 100K left but their total demand is only 78982. So these 21K numbers will be left which will be used for new applications recieved under EB2 category.
When PD for EB2-I/C moves forward, there will be more applications coming in because many EB2-I/C people have their labor approved and they are waiting to file their I-485. However, when these new applications comes in, they are NOT processed yet and their background check is not clear yet. So even if visa numbers are available for them, they are not ready to be approved.
So at this time we poor EB3 people can hope some mercy from DOS and we hope that DOS might spill those remaining 21K numbers to EB3 so we don't waste any numbers while USCIS is adjudicating those newly recd applications under EB2.
If this 21K spillover happens then we EB3-I have to hope for another mercy from DOS that they give these 21K spillover numbers strictly based on Priority dates in EB3 and not based on EB3-ROW first and then EB3-C and then EB3-M/P and then EB3-I. We expect DOS to give these spillover based on PD and not based on country of chargeability. If that happens then all these numbers will go to EB3-I and we might see it moving to 2003.
And this is a fair expectation from DOS that they give spillover numbers based on PD because that is what they are doing in EB2-. When EB2-ROW numbers goes to EB2-I and EB2-C they go based on PD and hence EB2-I gets most of the numbers.
My two cents. Please post your comments on my theory.
If we all EB3 agrees to above theory then we should seek help from IV to make sure that spillover to EB3 happens based on PD whenever it happens.
Thanks.
tattoo Tea Leoni and David Duchovny
appas123
08-04 05:02 PM
I would suggest taking an infopass appointment and also contact your congressman. No guarantees but those are two options so why not try both.
Forgot to mention that I am still awaiting a reply to the SR.
Forgot to mention that I am still awaiting a reply to the SR.
more...
pictures Hope Davis Joins Tea Leoni In
SGP
07-24 09:47 AM
Well, I think every one should write in their own way, but here are few imp things i feel.
-> sympathy point first ,How long you have been waiting
-> how much +ve impact was from your contribution to this country ( employer )
-> what are you
-> how you can be helped.
here is my cry...i have x'ed to mask some personal matter.
Let me know if i have send any wrong inline information!
I did send mine to the local congressman. Thanks
-> sympathy point first ,How long you have been waiting
-> how much +ve impact was from your contribution to this country ( employer )
-> what are you
-> how you can be helped.
here is my cry...i have x'ed to mask some personal matter.
Let me know if i have send any wrong inline information!
I did send mine to the local congressman. Thanks
dresses tea leoni family man.
vramamu
07-27 11:53 AM
My lawyer told me my labor got filed yesterday.
PD July 26th.
I have 2 questions...
I am in texas, where center do they file, and what is the way to find out how long does it take for approval?
I have been getting some reports..big delays and fast approvals.
In the rare :) possibility that I can get my approval with in 17th of Aug..
can I file 140 and AOS..in the window of oppurtunity that is currently open.
Any help is really appreciated
VJ
PD July 26th.
I have 2 questions...
I am in texas, where center do they file, and what is the way to find out how long does it take for approval?
I have been getting some reports..big delays and fast approvals.
In the rare :) possibility that I can get my approval with in 17th of Aug..
can I file 140 and AOS..in the window of oppurtunity that is currently open.
Any help is really appreciated
VJ
more...
makeup tea leoni family man.
rb_248
09-02 01:03 PM
Does CPO status on USCIS site mean 485 is approved? or is there some hidden processing going on, which can turn the tables??
Just skeptical.
btw, I forgot to mention. I thank the IV members for their invaluable guidance. Will continue being a regular member.
CPO = Card production ordered.....my understanding is that the card will be produced after the application is approved. So CPO = you got yourself an approval.
Just skeptical.
btw, I forgot to mention. I thank the IV members for their invaluable guidance. Will continue being a regular member.
CPO = Card production ordered.....my understanding is that the card will be produced after the application is approved. So CPO = you got yourself an approval.
girlfriend girlfriend The Family Man tea
gc_chahiye
10-14 11:03 PM
Has somebody ever wondered if EB limit is 140000 why the heck USCIS is allowed to accept millions of applications at the first place?
Can we sue USCIS for that?
load a big gun, aim at foot, fire.
P.S: Looks like you dont like EAD, AP, AC21 and all these acronyms and would love to have USCIS return 660K 485 applications back to the July 2nd filers.
Can we sue USCIS for that?
load a big gun, aim at foot, fire.
P.S: Looks like you dont like EAD, AP, AC21 and all these acronyms and would love to have USCIS return 660K 485 applications back to the July 2nd filers.
hairstyles Tea Leoni
ajaykk
05-12 02:22 PM
Got greened, I received my cards. The status still shows"Decision".
In this happy moment i have donated some amount to IV, I have been following IV regularly.
Thanks alot all the gurus. Good luck to everyone.
In this happy moment i have donated some amount to IV, I have been following IV regularly.
Thanks alot all the gurus. Good luck to everyone.
mpadapa
06-04 04:29 PM
Please call the house reps listed on this thread. Your calls are having a great impact. But we need more members to call to create a greater impact. Another one of the CHC member (Rep. Raul Grijalva) has become a co-sponsor for one of the bill (HR 5882)
source: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR05882:@@@P
Members please make the calls. Do also call the Reps listed on http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=19387
Together we can make it a success.
source: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR05882:@@@P
Members please make the calls. Do also call the Reps listed on http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=19387
Together we can make it a success.
sunny1000
05-21 12:33 PM
Hi I received from Chinese friend whose has some connections with lobbiests. Nonetheless, that is only for Murray amendment, but not for the HR bills. So please don't stop calling just because of it.
Yes, please keep calling.
The Murray Amendment is only on the Senate side which reportedly has been dropped from the Senate version of Appropriations Bill. What we are campaigning are for the separate stand-alone bills in the House which when passed will go to the Senate.
I am sure that our provision on the Senate side supposedly died because of the AgJobs which gave ammunition to the anti-immigrants to drop all immigration related measures from the Appropriations Bill. Some of us who have been thru this roller-coaster ride before, kinda saw this coming.
Again, please keep calling for the house side relief to our problems.
Thanks.
Yes, please keep calling.
The Murray Amendment is only on the Senate side which reportedly has been dropped from the Senate version of Appropriations Bill. What we are campaigning are for the separate stand-alone bills in the House which when passed will go to the Senate.
I am sure that our provision on the Senate side supposedly died because of the AgJobs which gave ammunition to the anti-immigrants to drop all immigration related measures from the Appropriations Bill. Some of us who have been thru this roller-coaster ride before, kinda saw this coming.
Again, please keep calling for the house side relief to our problems.
Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment